Johnson v. Martin et al
| Scott N. Johnson |
| Maria E. Martin, Jesus Sanchez, Refugio Martin and Guillermo Martin |
| 2:2011cv02751 |
| October 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| Morrison C. England |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/03/13 ORDERING that this Action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P. Rule 41(a) (1)(A). The Clerk is directed to close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/7/12: Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 4/7/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., trial briefs are due not later than 1/23/2014; Fi nal Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 2/6/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., the joint final pretrial statement is due not later than 1/6/2014; any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 1/16/2014, oppositions must be filed by 1/23/2014, and any reply must be filed by 1/30/2014. The motions will be heard by the Court at the same time as the Final Pretrial Conference. All other due dates set forth in the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order are confirmed. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
