Smith-Lovejoy v. Smith's Food and Drug Stores

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Smith-Lovejoy v. Smith's Food and Drug Stores

Smith-Lovejoy v. Smith's Food and Drug Stores

Plaintiff:	Andre Smith-Lovejoy
Defendant:	Smith's Food and Drug Stores
Case Number:	2:2011cv02878
Filed:	November 1, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1051
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 7, 2012	Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/6/12: F&R referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
December 23, 2011	Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/22/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee. plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.(Duong, D)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 7, 2012

Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/6/12: F&R referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

December 23, 2011

Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/22/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee. plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.(Duong, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith-Lovejoy v. Smith's Food and Drug Stores
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Smith-Lovejoy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Smith's Food and Drug Stores
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?