Romo v. Cate et al
| Ezequiel Romo |
| Mathew Cate, James Walker, T. Vigra, J. Stewart, Engellener, Ellen, R. Mendoza and E. Baker |
| 2:2011cv02898 |
| November 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kern |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/27/16 granting 75 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant's discovery requests within 30 days from the date of this order. Defendants' 09/15/16 motion to modify the dispositive motion deadline 91 is granted. The dispositive motion deadline is continued to 12/15/16. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/21/2016 ORDERING the defendants to file a status report within 7 days, apprising the Court of the status of their motion to compel.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER re settlement conference signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/28/16. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/16 ORDERING Warden, WSP, 701 Scofield Ave., P.O. Box 8800, Wasco, California 93280 to produce Ezequiel Romo, CDCR # K-38661 to testify before Judge Newman at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the court. FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/8/2016 GRANTING defendants' 76 request for a court-supervised settlement conference. This case is set for a settlement conference on 7/26/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) befor e Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Defendants' 76 request to vacate and reset the dispositive motions deadline is GRANTED. The parties shall file any dispositive motions within 60 days of the date of the settlement conference. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the court's 9/8/2015 discovery and scheduling order remains in effect. (cc: KJN, ADR)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER ADOPTING 69 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/24/2015. Defendants' 59 Motion to Dismiss, which Court treats as a Motion for Summary Judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(d) and 56, is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
69
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/23/15 RECOMMENDING that the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 59 ), which should be treated as a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(d) and 56, be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/30/2014 ADOPTING the 53 findings and recommendations as amended by the magistrate judge's 9/16/14 order; the 47 motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with this order; and defendants J. Baker, Williams, Holstrom and Walker are DISMISSED from this action. (See Order for Details)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/15/2014 AMENDING 53 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this order in which to file objections, if any, to the amended recommendations listed in paragraph 1 of this order. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/29/2014 VACATING in part, the 1/9/2014 court order 45 , insofar as it states plaintiff has not complied with the pleading requirements of the CA Tort Claims Act; and the Clerk is DIRECTED to assign this case to a district judge; AND RECOMMENDING that the 47 motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part (See F&R for Details). Assigned and Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/19/13 ordering within 20 days from the date of this order plaintiff shall show cause in writing if any he has why this action should not be dismissed as a sanction for his failure to comply with the court's 09/24/12 order. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the court's form civil rights complaint and accompanying instructions. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/21/12 ordering plaintiff's 07/16/12 motion 13 is granted. Plaintiff's third amended complaint 12 is deemed timely filed. Plaintiff's third amended complaint is dismissed. With in 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached notice of amendment and submit it along with an original and copy of the fourth amended complaint. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a copy of the court's form civil rights complaint and accompanying instructions. Plaintiff's 07/26/12 motion for appointment of counsel 14 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ezequiel Romo signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/30/12. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial) (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
