Nagy v. Davey et al
Petitioner: Daniel Nagy
Respondent: D. Davey, McDonald and Barker
Case Number: 2:2011cv02948
Filed: November 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/21/16 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
November 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/24/2015 ADOPTING 37 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 35 Motion to Reinstate the Stay of this Action; GRANTING 36 Motion for Extension of Time to file a Traverse; ORDERING the petitioner to file a traverse in support of his exhausted claims within sixty days. (Michel, G.)
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/16/2015 DIRECTING the Clerk to send petitioner a courtesy copy of his original petition for writ of habeas corpus. IT IS RECOMMEDED that petitioner's 35 m otion to re-instate the stay in this action be denied; and petitioner's 36 motion for an extension of time to file a traverse be GRANTED, and petitioner be directed to file a traverse in support of his exhausted claims within 60 days of an order adopting these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/1/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 32 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 31 Renewed Motion For Stay and Abeyance. Petitioner shall file a traverse, if any, in support of his exhausted claims within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Meuleman, A)
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/28/15 recommending that petitioner's motion to re-instate the stay of this action construed as a renewed motion for a stay and abeyance 31 be denied; and petitioner be directed to file a traverse, if any, in support of his exhausted claims within 30 days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. MOTION to reinstate stay of abeyance 31 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
August 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/18/14 granting 26 Motion to Stay. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, petitioner may file a traverse. If petitioner chooses not to file a traverse he shall so notify the court of that decision in writing within 30 days of this order and this matter will be deemed submitted for decision. (Plummer, M)
June 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/05/14 ordering within 30 days of the service of this order, petitioner shall show cause in writing why the current stay should not be lifted with him being required to proceed in this habeas action only on his already exhausted claims. (Plummer, M)
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/9/2012 ORDERING that petitioner's 4/16/2012 motion for stay and abeyance is construed as including a request to delete his unexhausted claims and, so construe d, is GRANTED; petitioner's 11/7/11 original petition is DEEMED AMENDED by the deletion of Grounds A, E, F, G and H, all of which are unexhausted; and RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 20 motion for stay and abeyance be granted; this actio n be stayed pending exhaustion of state court remedies with respect to petitioner's unexhausted claims; this action not proceed further unless and until petitioner files a motion to lift the stay, which should be filed within 30 days from the date of any final order by the CA Supreme Court resolving his state exhaustion petition; and the Clerk be directed to administratively close this case. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/4/12 ORDERING that Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file either an appropriate motion to stay these proceedings pending exhaustion of state court remedies as to any unexhausted claims or an amended petition; 18 Motion for Extension of time to file a traverse is DENIED without prejudice; 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nagy v. Davey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Nagy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Davey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?