JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Resource Real Estate Services, LLC, et. al.
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Resource Real Estate Services, LLC and Resource Title, LLC |
2:2011cv03013 |
November 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Kendall J. Newman |
Garland E. Burrell |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/1/2012 ORDERING 1 Complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; plaintiff is GRANTED 14 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint; Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to 4/23/2012 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. in Courtroom 10 (GEB); a joint status report shall be filed not later than 14 days prior to the status conference. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 6 ORDER of RECUSAL AND REASSIGNMENT signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/15/2011 ORDERING that Judge Lawrence K. Karlton recuses himself as the judge to whom this case is assigned. All currently scheduled dates in the above-captioned action are VA CATED. The Clerk of the Court reassign this case to another judge for all further proceedings, making appropriate adjustments in the assignments of civil cases to compensate for such reassignment. This case is REASSIGNED to the Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.