ViaSat, Inc. v. Pearl Networks, Inc. et al
ViaSat, Inc. |
Pearl Networks, Inc., Yonder Wireless of California, LLC and Yonder Broadband of California - Yuba, LLC |
2:2011cv03146 |
November 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 TRADEMARK NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Trademark #1:* 3,978,158 * * 6/14/2011 * * Viasat, Inc. * Trademark #2:* 3,739,881 * * 1/19/10 * * ViaSat, Inc. * ; (Attachments: # 1 Consent to Magistrate Judge, # 2 Trademark Report, # 3 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pearl Networks, Inc., Yonder Broadband of California - Yuba, LLC, Yonder Wireless of California, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kenneth M. Fitzgerald* *Chapin Fitzgerald Sullivan & Bottini LLP* *550 West C Street, Suite 200* *San Diego, CA 92101*. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Service Mark Infringement; False Designation of Origin; Unfair Competition and False Advertising against All Defendants by ViaSat, Inc.. Attorney Fitzgerald, Kenneth M. added. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Fitzgerald, Kenneth) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200040347 $350.00 fbo ViaSat, Inc. by Kenneth M. Fitzgerald on 11/29/2011. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.