Phillips v. Victor Community Support Services, Inc.
| Mary H. Phillips |
| Victor Community Support Services, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv03182 |
| December 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/2015 ORDERING that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/19/14. The deadline to file the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is extended to 7/4/14. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
29
FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/7/14: Trial is scheduled for 5/12/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The estimated length of trial is three (3) to four (4) days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/18/12 ORDERING the initial expert witness disclosure date is continued from on or before January 7, 2013 to on or before March 8, 2013, and the any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure dat e from on or before February 8, 2013 to on or before March 29, 2013; the discovery completion date is continued from February 8, 2013 to March 29, 2013; the last hearing date for a motion is continued from April 8, 2013 to May 10, 2013; and the final pretrial conference is continued from June 10, 2013, to July 19, 2013. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/5/12 ORDERING the Court continue the expert witness disclosure requirements in the referenced matter, after considering the parties stipulation as follows: the current initial expert witness disclosure requirements are continued for 90 days from October 9, 2012 to January 7, 2013, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal disclosure are continued from November 9, 2012 to February 8, 2013. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/4/2012 VACATING the Scheduling Conference set for 4/11/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison; REFERRING this matter back to the District Judge pursuant to L.R. 302(c)(21). (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Phillips v. Victor Community Support Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary H. Phillips | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Victor Community Support Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Bishop |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
