Goff v. Salinas
Petitioner: Thomas L Goff
Respondent: M. Salinas
Case Number: 2:2011cv03251
Filed: December 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/17/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
June 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/13/13 STRIKING 31 Motion for judgment on pleadings as premature. (Dillon, M)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING 33 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/8/13 and GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 16 Motion to Dismiss; this petition proceeds only as to claim 1 and a portion of claim 3. (Manzer, C)
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/08/13 recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss 16 be denied in part and granted in part as follows: Denied on the ground that the petition is untimley; and g ranted as to the following claims on the ground that they do not allege facts that, if proven, would constitute violations of due process: claims 2, 4, 5, 6 and that portion of claim 3 which alleges that an investigative employee or other staff assis tant was not at the disciplinary hearing; and this petition proceed only as to claim 1 and that portion of claim 3 which alleges that no witnesses were present at his disciplinary hearing. MOTION to DISMISS 16 referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
February 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/13/13 ORDERING that petitioner's request for reconsideration (Docket No. 28 ) is denied. Because there is no appeal pending, and because the procedures of California Penal Code are inapplicable to these proceedings, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Appellate Counsel Pursuant to Penal Code Section § 1240 (Docket No. 29 ) is also denied. (Becknal, R)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/11/12 denying without prejudice 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
December 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/22/11 ORDERING that Petitioners challenge to (a) his 2010 prison disciplinary conviction forpossession of alcohol within the institution is severed from (b) his challenge to the 2010 finding o f guilt in a prison disciplinary hearing on a charge of forgery/falsification of documents; The Clerk of the Court is directed to open a new habeas action as to (a) in # 1 above, and the instant petition is to proceed as to (b) in #1. The Clerk of th e Court is further directed to: (a) to assign the new action to the undersigned magistrate judge to whom the instant case is assigned and to make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for such assignment; (b) File and docket a copy of this order in the additional new case file opened for petitioner; (c) Place a copy of the petition filed on December 7, 2011, in the separate actions case docket; ( d) send petitioner two new forms for filing a habeas petition pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 used in this district; Petitioners 2 request for in forma pauperis status is GRANTED as to both petitions; The December 7, 2011 petition is dismissed in both cases with leave to amend within thirty days, as set forth herein; Petitioners December 7, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel 3 is DENIED without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. (The new case number is 2:11-cv-3410 GGH)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goff v. Salinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas L Goff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Salinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?