Garcia et al v. County of Sacramento et al
| Juan Rafael Garcia, Maria Garcia, Nataly Garcia, Oswaldo Garcia and Yamilet Garcia |
| County of Sacramento and Jeffrey Morace |
| 2:2011cv03317 |
| December 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/3/14. Plaintiffs MARIA GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA, YAMILET GARCIA and OSWALDO GARCIA (minors through their grandfather and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia); NATALY GARCIA, Individua lly; YAMILET GARCIA, Individually; and OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually, dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) their claims against Defendants in this action. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The claims of Plaintiff JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA against Defendants remain. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 1/7/2014 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER 26 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/27/13 ORDERING that the deadline for hearing Defendants' motion for summary judgment is extended from February 11, 2014 to March 13, 2014. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/12/13 ORDERING the deadline for non-expert discovery is extended from June 26, 2013 to July 26, 2013. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/04/12 ORDERING that the 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: defendants' motion to dismiss the third claim for relief for violation of equal rights under 42 U.S.C . § 1981 is GRANTED with leave to amend; defendants' motion to dismiss the fourth claim for relief for failure to train under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is GRANTED with leave to amend; defendants' motion to dismiss the fifth claim for relie f for failure to supervise under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is GRANTED with leave to amend; defendants' motion to dismiss the sixth claim for relief from unconstitutional policies under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is GRANTED with leave to amend; defendants' motion to dismiss the eighth claim for relief for IIED is DENIED; defendants' motion to dismiss the ninth claim for relief for NIED is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within 21 days. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
