Johnson v. Maciel et al
| Scott N. Johnson |
| Sandra L. Maciel, Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. and Donald F. Maciel |
| 2:2011cv03347 |
| December 16, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/22/2012 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/8/2012 ORDERING that the parties shall file dispositional documents no later than 5/21/2012. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER 13 re Disposal Documents after Notification of Settlement signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/11/2012. Dispositional documents shall be filed no later than 20 days from effective date of this Order. All hearing dates set in matter are hereby VACATED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 04/05/12 ORDERING that the 8 Clerk's Entry of Default against Donald F. Maciel and Sandra L. Maciel is SET ASIDE and all defendants will file an answer to the complaint within 10 days of defendants' notice of the court having set aside the default. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
