United States of America et al v. Calhoun
Petitioner: United States of America and Kim Ulring
Respondent: Everett D. Calhoun
Case Number: 2:2011mc00068
Filed: August 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER adopting in 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/18/11. The IRS summons issued to respondent, Everett D. Calhoun, shall be enforced. Respondent is ordered to appear at the I.R.S. offices at 4330 Watt Avenue,Sacramento, CA 95821, before Revenue Officer Kim Ulring, or her designated representative, within 10 days of this issuance of the summons enforcement order, then and there to be sworn, to give testimony, and to produce for examining and copying the books, checks, records, papers and other data demanded by the summons, the examination to continue from day to day until completed. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce its order by its contempt power. (Kastilahn, A)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/11 re 1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons RECOMMENDING that the IRS summons issued to respondent be enforced and that respondent be ordered to appear at the I.R.S. offices within 10 days of this issuance of the summons enforcement order, and further RECOMMENDS that if it enforces the summons, the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce its order by its contempt power. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/1/11 ORDERING that the Respondent, EVERETT D. CALHOUN, appear before United States Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd, in that Magistrate Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, on Friday, September 30,2011, at 10:00 a.m., to show cause why the respondent should not be compelled to obey the Internal Revenue Service summons issued on April 20, 2011.(Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Yoshinori H. T. Himel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kim Ulring
Represented By: Yoshinori H. T. Himel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Everett D. Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?