Starr v. State of California et al
| Robin Gillen Starr |
| State of California and CSPC/CDCR |
| 2:2012cv00083 |
| January 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and Petitioners pending motions and requests (dkt. nos. 40 , 41 , 45 , 50 ) are DENIED without prejudice; and it is RECOMMENDED that 43 MOTION to DISMISS be granted; and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 47 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/12/12. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/27/12 ordering the second amended petition 18 is dismissed with leave to file a third amended petition within 21 days after service of this order. The following motions are denied without pr ejudice: Petitioner's motion to compel discovery 19 ; Petitioner's motion to produce documents 20 ; Petitioner's motion for an order directing respondents to show cause and for a permanent injunction 21 ; Petitioner's motion fo r an order dismissing the criminal action against petitioner 25 ; and Petitioner's motion for default judgment 26 . With the exception of a third amended petition, petitioner shall file no other documents or motions in this action without first obtaining permission of this court; failure to abide by this directive may result in dismissal of this action. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner with service of this order a blank 28 USC 2254 writ of habeas corpus form. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/19/2012 ORDERING that Petitioner's 14 objections to the court's 5/31/2012 order, are OVERRULED. Petitioner's 15 Motion to compel discovery is DENIED as premature. Petitioner& #039;s 13 , 16 requests for appointment of counsel are DENIED without prejudice to renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. Petitioner's 13 request for a sixty-day extension of time withinwhich to file a Second Amended Pet ition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file, within sixty (60) days after the filing date of this order, on the form used by this court, a Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner's failure to timely f ile a legible Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, on the form used by this district, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a blank form used in this district for filing a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/30/12 ORDERING that 11 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; Petitioners amended petition for writ of habeas corpus 10 , is DISMISSED; Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file a second amended petition containing only the claims challenging his Sacramento County conviction, and using the courts form; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for filing a habeas corpus petition.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/12 ORDERING that petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis 7 , is GRANTED. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 , is dismissed. Petitioner is granted 30 days from th e date of this order to file an amended petition containing only the claims challenging his Sacramento County conviction; failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Petitioners motion for trial 6 , is DENIED. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/07/12 ordering petitioner shall submit within 14 days after the filing date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee of $5.00. The clerk of the court shall again send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis application form used in this district.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/23/12 ORDERING Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
