Ooley et al v. Citrus Heights Police Dept. et al
| Garr Ooley and Janis Starkey |
| Citrus Heights Police Department, Brian Barron, Janet Schaefer, D Christensen, Christine Ford, Chris Boyd, Leland Murray, Mary Murray, Stephanie Murray, Nicolas Maurer, Yvonne Steiner Maurer, Michelle Kirwan, Dreama C Larish, Anthony Larish, Jonathan Hanly, Trevor Kirwan and Alan Spinner |
| 2:2012cv00095 |
| January 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
JUDGMENT signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/3/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/26/13 ORDERING that the CHPD Defendants' MOTION for Attorneys' Fees 79 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
87
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/7/13 DISMISSING Nicolas Maurer from this action subject to the terms and conditions in this stipulation. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2013 GRANTING 62 the CHPD Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and ORDERING Plaintiff's 1983 claim against the CHPD Defendants DISMISSED with prejudice. Any remaining state law claim against the CHPD Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice. Leave to amend the First Amended Complaint with respect to the CHPD Defendants is DENIED. (CHPD Defendants Citrus Heights Police Department, D Christensen, Christine Ford, Brian Barron, Chris Boyd, and Janet Schaefer DISMISSED). (Krueger, M)
|
|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT ON AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/15/12. Judgment is entered in accordance with the Court's order filed on 9/11/12 56 . That Defendants, CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRIAN BARRON, JANET SCHAEFER, D. CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTINE FORD and CHRIS BOYD are awarded Attorney's fees in the amount of $4,108.50 as against the Plaintiff, JANIS STARKEY.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/10/2012 ORDERING 43 that the Neighbor Defendants are not entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to 42:1988 under either the Sec 1988 standard applied to prevailing defendants or the standard normally applied to prevailing plaintiffs. Their motion is therefore DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/29/12. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/24/12 GRANTING 6 Motion to Dismiss. D Christensen, Citrus Heights Police Department, Christine Ford, Janet Schaefer, Brian Barron and Chris Boyd DISMISSED with prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER 35 for extension of time signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/2012. Defendants Nicolas Maurer and Yvonne Pickering (erroneously sued and served as Yvonne Steiner Maurer) have up to and including 20 days following ruling on defendants' 6 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint to respond. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 02/14/12 ORDERING that defendants Citrus Heights Police Dept., Brian Barron, Janet Schaefer, D. Christensen, Christine Ford and Chris Boyd have 10 days following the ruling on the 6 Motion to Dismiss as to plaintiff Janis Starkey to respond to the Compliant as to plaintiff Garr Ooley, depending on the ruling of the Court. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
