Rosene et al v. American Brokers Conduit et al
| Shaun L. Rosene and Donald G. Rosene |
| American Brokers Conduit, Placer Title Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Default Resolutions Network and Power Default Services, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00107 |
| January 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/10/12 ORDERING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/04/12 ORDERING that the hearing on Placer Title's 9 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 04/25/12 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; plaintiffs shall SHOW CAUSE by 04/11/12 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition by 04/11/12. Placer Title Company may file a reply to plaintiffs' opposition by 04/18/12. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/12 CONTINUING Hearing as to 5 MOTION to DISMISS RESET for 4/25/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; ORDERING plaintiffs to show cau se in writing no later than 4/11/12 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposit ion thereto, no later than 4/11/12. Failure of Plaintiffs to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with court orders and this courts Local Rules. Defendants may file a reply to plaintiffs opposition on or before 4/18/12. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
