Patterson v. Old Republic Title Company et al
| Pat Patterson |
| Old Republic Title Company, Assured Lending Corporation, Chase Bank NA and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00175 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/27/2012 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a). The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case and vacate all dates. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/22/2012 DISCHARGING 6 Order to Show Cause; ORDERING Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/25/12 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DISMISSING with leave to AMEND 1 Complaint. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint that is complete in itself. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
