Mays v. Trinity County Jail and Medical Procedures et al
Jeremy Scott Mays |
Krouse, Peter Braga, Bruce Haney, Trinity County Jail and Medical Procedures and Michael Novak |
2:2012cv00283 |
February 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Trinity |
Craig M. Kellison |
Morrison C. England |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 04/25/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 03/22/12 ordering that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this case and to update the docket to reflect the new case number. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to this action. The case number is 2:12-cv-0283 MCE CMK (PC). (Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/8/2012 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a complete ifp application with the required certified trust account statement or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send plaintiff a new ifp application. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.