Kenealy v. Joint Force Headquarters, et al.
Sarah Kenealy |
Joint Force Headquarters, Director of State Personnel Programs, Robert Vance, Sally Churchin, Andreas O Garza and Shannon Baptiste |
2:2012cv00320 |
February 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Kendall J. Newman |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/24/12 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case and vacate all dates. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 10 ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/12. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to review Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and her Return of Service, and attempt to re- serve d efendant if plaintiff believes such re-service is required. Status Conference RESET for 8/9/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket to reflect that defendant Joint Force Headquarters is the only remaining defendant in this case. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 2 ORDER transferring case to Sacramento Division signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/6/2012. (Lundstrom, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.