Duronslet v. Baker et al
| Paul Michael Duronslet |
| John H. Baker, Pamela S. Johansen, Deborah Mae Saeger and Bryan Flicker |
| 2:2012cv00406 |
| February 16, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Butte |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/14/13 ORDERING that the clerk serve a copy of these findings and recommendations on plaintiff at his address of record and at: Paul Duronslet CDCR # AM6139, Deuel Vocational Institution, PO Box 600, Tracy, CA 95378-0600. Also, RECOMMENDING that that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 28 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Paul Duronslet signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/05/12. The Sheriff of Butte County is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Butte County. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
