Barragan v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al
| George Barragan |
| WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR14, WAMU Asset Acceptance Corp, LaSalle Bank National Association, Washington Mutual Bank, FA, California Reconveyance Company, Fidelity Title Company, Washington Mutual Bank, Washington Mutual Bank PSA, Fred Restrepo, Lasalle Bank National Association PSA and Dalila Ochoa |
| 2:2012cv00498 |
| February 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/19/2013 RECOMMENDING that the Plaintiff's federal claims be dismissed with prejudice; RECOMMENDING that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims and that they be dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff filing them in State Court. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/20/2012 ORDERING that Defendant Fidelity's 5 motion to dismiss is VACATED. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing and within 14 days from the issuance of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failing to complete service on any of the defendants except for Fidelity. Plaintiff shall file, within 28 days from issuance of this order, an amended complaint styled as Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/21/2012 VACATING the Motion Hearing as to 5 Motion to Dismiss set for 8/30/2012; SUBMITTING 5 Motion to Dismiss on the record, without oral argument. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/28/12. The Court determines that recusal is not necessary.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
