Ando v. Alliance Bancorp, et al
Edith Ando |
Bank of America NA, Bank of New York, Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OC11, Recontrust Company, Christina Balandran, Alliance Bancorp, Randolyn Logan, Michelle Miller, North American Title Company and Countywide Homes Loans Servicing LP |
2:2012cv00523 |
February 28, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service on any defendant within time specified; failure to comply with multiple requirements of Court's 4/17/2012 4 Order; and failure to prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/13/2012. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff may file written Objections with Court. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/16/12 ORDERING that A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, July 13, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27 (see order for further details).(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.