Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Nichole C. Carter
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2012cv00638
Filed: March 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/16/13 Settling Attorney's Fees. (Meuleman, A)
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/18/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 15 is granted in part and denied in part; The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment 16 is granted in part an d denied in part; Judgment is entered for plaintiff with respect to her claim for SSI under Title XVI of the Social Security Act insofar as plaintiff's SSI claim under Title XVI of the Social Security Act is remanded for further proceedings con sistent with this order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Judgment is entered for the Commissioner with respect to plaintiff's claims for DIB and Disabled Child Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act; The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Becknal, R)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/10/12 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file her Motion For Summary Judgment on or before 10/1/2012. The court's scheduling order is modified accordingly. (Kastilahn, A)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/19/2012 ORDERING Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis # 2 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cas es. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM an original and 5 copies each of the completed summons, copies of the complaint, copies of the scheduling order and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. The USM shall thereafter file a statement with the court that such documents have been served. (cc: USM) (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nichole C. Carter
Represented By: Ann M. Cerney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Represented By: Daniel P. Talbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?