United States of America v. Brekke

United States of America v. Brekke

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	Ronald Lee Brekke
Case Number:	2:2012cv00722
Filed:	March 22, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge:	William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit:	Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2013	Filing 25 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/11/13: Defendant's motion entitled "Coram Non-Judice No Subject Matter Jurisdiction" (Docket No. 23 and 24) is DENIED. This court had jurisdiction to enter its Order of August 27, 2012 (Docket No. 18), and will not set it aside. (Kaminski, H)
June 26, 2012	Filing 8 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 6/25/12 ORDERING that the June 28, 2012 hearing on plaintiffs motion for default judgment is VACATED; and RECOMMENDING that 7 Motion for Default Judgment against B rekke be granted; The court declare that the UCC Financing Statements at issue are null, void, and without legal effect; The court enjoin defendant from filing similar non-consensual liens in the future against employees of the United States. The court enter the proposed order granting declaratory and injunctive relief, which is approved as to substance and form. This action be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2013

Filing 25 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/11/13: Defendant's motion entitled "Coram Non-Judice No Subject Matter Jurisdiction" (Docket No. 23 and 24) is DENIED. This court had jurisdiction to enter its Order of August 27, 2012 (Docket No. 18), and will not set it aside. (Kaminski, H)

June 26, 2012

Filing 8 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 6/25/12 ORDERING that the June 28, 2012 hearing on plaintiffs motion for default judgment is VACATED; and RECOMMENDING that 7 Motion for Default Judgment against B rekke be granted; The court declare that the UCC Financing Statements at issue are null, void, and without legal effect; The court enjoin defendant from filing similar non-consensual liens in the future against employees of the United States. The court enter the proposed order granting declaratory and injunctive relief, which is approved as to substance and form. This action be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Brekke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Adair Ford Boroughs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Lee Brekke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?