Hittle v. City of Stockton et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Hittle
Defendant: City of Stockton, Robert Deis and Laurie Montes
Case Number: 2:2012cv00766
Filed: March 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/1/22 GRANTING 98 Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING 133 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING as moot 130 , 140 , 149 Motions to Strike. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close the case. (Kaminski, H)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/18/2021 GRANTING 113 Ex Parte Application. Defendants shall file their Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition Brief to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 4/2/2021. The hearing date re 98 Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 4/29/2021.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/2/21 GRANTING 111 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is due not later than March 19, 2021. Plaintiff's other motions related to an extension of time are DENIED as moot 103 , 104 , 109 . (Kaminski, H)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 97 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/17/21 ORDERING that Defendants shall file and serve their motion for summary judgment on or before 2/18/21, setting the hearing date for 4/1/21. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the summary judgment motion on 3/11/21 and Defendants shall file their reply on 3/25/21. (Kastilahn, A)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/11/2021 GRANTING Defendants' Request to Increase Page Limit (ECF No. 93 ). Defendants' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment shall not exceed (25) twenty-five pages. In light of this page limit increase, the page limit for Plaintiff's memorandum of points and authorities in opposition is extended to no more than (25) twenty-five pages. No increase is made as to the Reply page limit. (Krueger, M)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 90 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/26/2021 re: Deposition of Michael Rishwain. The Parties hereby stipulate that if the deposition of Mr. Rishwain is ordered, that deposition can occur subsequent to the close of the discovery period. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 1/26/2021 (Donati, J).
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 82 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/24/2020 EXTENDING the non-expert discovery cut off to 1/29/2021 and disclosure of expert witnesses to 1/29/2021. (Zignago, K.)
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/7/2020 ORDERING that within one week of this order, defendants shall present to plaintiff a declaration from the City's Custodian of Records indicating that the allegedly-missing documents (including recordings) either: (a) existed but cannot be located, (b) did not exist, or (c) have already been produced. Plaintiffs are granted 4 hours to depose Deis and 4 hours to depose Montes; this includes whatever time remains from their previous deposition. (Kastilahn, A)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 73 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/24/2020 EXTENDING deadlines as follows: Non-Expert Discovery due by 7/30/2020. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/1/2020 with Designation of Supplemental Witnesses due 20 days later. Dispositive Motions heard by 2/10/2021 with supplemental disclosures due 30 days prior to dispositive motion hearing date. Joint Notice of Trial Readiness due within 30 days of receipt of ruling on dispositive motion or 120 days after close of discovery if not intent to file dispositive motions. (Coll, A)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/18/20 MODIFYING the Scheduling Order as follows: Non-expert discovery cut off: 05/01/20; Disclosure of expert witnesses: 07/03/20; Designation of supplemental experts: 20 days lat er; Supplemental disclosures: 30 days prior to dispositive motion hearing date; Dispositive motion hearing date: no later than 11/12/20; Joint Notice of Trial Readiness: within 30 days of receipt of ruling on dispositive motion, or 120 days after close of discovery if neither party has an intent to file dispositive motions. (Benson, A.)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/11/2019 ORDERING 59 Pretrial Scheduling Order MODIFIED as follows: Discovery cut off EXTENDED to 12/3/2019; Designation of Expert Witnesses EXTENDED to 2/3/2020; Designation of Supplemental Experts : 20 days later; Supplemental Disclosures: at least 30 days prior to dispositive motion hearing date; Dispositive Motion Hearing Date: no later than 6/11/2020; Joint Notice of Trial Readiness: Within 30 days of receipt of ruling on dispositive motion, or 120 days after close of discovery if not intent to file dispositive motions. In all other respects, the Order remains in full force and effect. (Washington, S)
April 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/24/18, ORDERING that defendants' responsive pleading to the second amended complaint is DUE on 5/3/18. (Kastilahn, A)
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/2018 ORDERING as follows: With respect to the First and Second Causes of Action, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, with leave to amend; With respect to the Third and Fourth Causes of Actio n, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, without leave to amend; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Causes of Action; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to P laintiff's Eighth Cause of Action, except that the Court finds Defendants Montes and Deis, in their individual capacity, are entitled to qualified immunity as set forth above in connection with their alleged infringement on Plaintiff's right to intimate association; and Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint in conformity with this Order within 30 days of the date this Order is filed. (Becknal, R)
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/24/2016 CONTINUING the hearing on 39 Motion to Dismiss to 6/30/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Michel, G.)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/30/16 ORDEIRNG that Defendants' 24 motion to dismiss the complaint is hereby GRANTED as to all counts. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Should Plaintiff wish to file an amended complaint, such complaint must be filed within 30 days of the entry of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
September 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/5/2012 ORDERING that the City's bankruptcy stay applies to Plaintiff's claims against Individual Defendants; and Individual Defendants' dismissal motions filed 5/29/2012 are deemed WITHDRAWN. The parties shall file a status order within five (5) days of the lifting of the bankruptcy stay. (Zignago, K.)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/5/12: Defendant City of Stockton's dismissal motion is deemed withdrawn. Each non-bankruptcy party shall file a brief within fourteen days of the date on which this Order is filed. (Kaminski, H)
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/19/12: The 6/25/12 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is VACATED; Discovery shall be completed by 8/7/2013; Designation of Expert Witnesses is due by 3/7/2013, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure is due by 4/8/2013; The last hearing date for a motion is 10/7/2013, commencing at 9:00 a.m.; The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 12/16/2013 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Trial is SET for 3/11/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hittle v. City of Stockton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Hittle
Represented By: Mark Stephen Adams
Represented By: John Paul Briscoe
Represented By: William J Gorham, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Stockton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Deis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurie Montes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?