Federal Trade Commission v. NAFSO VLM, Inc. et al
Federal Trade Commission |
Michael Kamfiroozie, NAFSO VLM, Inc., Kore Services, LLC and Naythem Nafso |
2:2012cv00781 |
March 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 STIPULATED FINAL ORDER for Permanent Injunction and Settlement of Claims signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/8/13. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/29/2012 denying 6 Motion for TRO. However, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED insofar as it requests that the court order defendants to preserve records, including electronic records, and evidence and allo w plaintiff to conduct limited expedited discovery. A hearing on plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction is set for April 11, 2012 at 1 p.m. Any opposition shall be filed no later than April 6, 2012, reply shall be filed no later than April 9, 2012. Plaintiff shall notify defendants of this hearing and briefing schedule. (Andrews, P) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/28/2012 re 2 Notice of Related Case filed by Federal Trade Commission ORDERING that the actions involve different defendants and would involve different factual issues; therefore, the undersigned judge DECLINES to relate the actions. (Waggoner, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.