Harris v. Virga et al
| Marvin Harris |
| Johnson, P. Wheeler and Tim Virga |
| 2:2012cv00838 |
| April 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/17/12 recommending that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 7 be denied pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); and this action be dismissed without prejudice. MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 7 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/2/2012 ORDERING that within 30 days, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why his ifp application should not be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), or in the alternative, plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/19/12 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, either the $350.00 filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis for use in a civil rights action. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
