Mililani Group, Inc. v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
| Mililani Group, Inc. |
| O'Reilly Automotive Inc. and CSK Auto, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00891 |
| April 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/24/2016 ORDERING Judgment is FURTHER entered in favor of O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., and against Mililani Group, Inc., in the amount of $103,417.28. Interest shall accru e on the principal amount owed, $82,770.50, at the rate specified in the contract Plaintiff sued upon, 12% per annum - a daily rate of $27.21 per day - from 8/23/2016, until the date the Second Amended Judgment is satisfied in full. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
53
AMENDED JUDGMENT signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/27/2013 ORDERING that judgment is entered in favor of O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., and against Mililani Group, Inc., in the amount of $52,741.50, in accordance with the Court's Ord er of 9/11/2013. Interest shall accrue on this Amended Judgment at the rate specified in the contract Plaintiff sued upon, 12% per annum, from the date of the Court's award, 9/11/2013, until the date the Amended Judgment is satisfied in full. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/10/2013 GRANTING O'Reilly's 39 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court awards O'Reilly $52,741.50. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/12/2013 ORDERING defendant O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. to file, by 8/16/2013, any reply in support of 39 Motion for Attorney Fees; ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/12/2013 ORDERING plaintiff's counsel to file a declaration, by 8/16/2013, as to why 43 Opposition was filed late and why sanctions should not be imposed. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/14/2013 GRANTING 31 Defendant's Motion for Entry of Judgment in favor of O'Reilly. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/3/13 ORDERING that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. The case will proceed on the Second Amended Complaint on only the breach of contract claim against CSK. Further, Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #18) is denied as moot. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/26/2012 ORDERING that Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be filed within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. If Plaint iff elects not to file an Amended Complaint, the case will proceed on the First Amended Complaint on only the breach of contract claim against CSK. Defendants must file their response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days from the date any Amended Complaint is filed. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
