Lewis et al v. Gardiner, et al
| David K. Lewis, Ken A Marchesin and Robert Mistriel |
| T. Robertson, R. L. Gower, R. Weeks, De La Garza-Dillard, Beck, Hanks, R. Peery, D. L. Kraft, M. Brown, D. Foston, D. Clark, Gardiner and P. Statti |
| 2:2012cv00986 |
| April 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/10/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER adopting 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/28/12: The request for permissive joinder of plaintiffs and for class certification is denied. Plaintiffs Ken A Marchesin and Robert Mistriel dismissed. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/18/2012 RECOMMENDING that the requests for permissive joinder of plaintiffs and for class certification be denied, and that plaintiffs Ken Marchesin and Robert Mistriel be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
