Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc. et al
Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC |
X-Body Equipment, Inc., Paladin Brands Group, Inc. and Jewell Attachments, LLC |
X-Body Equipment, Inc. |
Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC |
2:2012cv01004 |
April 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Garland E. Burrell |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/29/15 DENYING 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 89 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/23/2014 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 73 Motion for Attorneys' Fees to 11/3/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; ORDERING that reply papers be filed by 10/20/2014; ORDERING that opposition papers be filed by 10/6/2014. (Michel, G) |
Filing 84 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS AND REDACT INFORMATION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/18/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 77 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/15/14: HEARING as to 73 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES RESET for 10/20/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 70 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/8/2014 GRANTING defendants' 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is CLOSED. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 61 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/26/2014 ORDERING that the deadline for initial expert disclosures is EXTENDED from 8/16/2014 to 10/10/2014 and the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is EXTENDED from 9/16/2014 to 11/14/2014. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 58 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/5/2014 ORDERING 57 Motion Hearing on Summary Judgment Reset for 7/28/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; Opposition to defendants' motion due by 6/30/2014. (Reader, L) |
Filing 51 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/24/2014 ORDERING 50 Non-Discovery shall be completed 1/15/2015; Expert Discovery by 2/16/2015; Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 8/16/2014, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure on or before 9/16/2014; the last hearing date for motions is 3/16/2015 at 9:00 AM; Final Pretrial Conference Reset for 5/18/2015 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; Trial Reset for 8/25/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Reader, L) |
Filing 45 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/6/2013 ORDERING Defendants' proposed claim constructions are NOT Adopted. Further, no disputed claim terms fail for indefiniteness. In addition, the following construction of "transport container" has been adopted: "a container for moving material from one geographic location to another," which is ADOPTED. Each of the disputed claim terms addressed in this ruling is not construed, with the exception of two claim terms. (Reader, L) |
Filing 44 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/27/13. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/9/13 CONTINUING Claim Construction Hearing to 8/19/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on May 30, 2013 re 30 . The claims construction breifing schedule will be adjusted as follows: The parties shall simultaneously file Opening Claim Construction Briefs and supporting Evidence by 06/24/2013; The parties shall file Responsive Claim Construction Briefs by 07/12/2013; Technology Tutorial before the Court will be held on 07/12/2013 at 1:30 PM; Claim Construction Hearing remains set for 07/29/2013 at 10:00 AM. (Rivas, A) |
Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/10/13 EXTENDING the deadline to 6/3/13 for each party to file simultaneous opening claim construction briefs and supporting evidence. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/25/13 ORDERING that the parties' request for entry of the proposed stipulated protective order 24 is denied without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 22 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/30/12 issuing Claim Construction Schedule: Each party shall serve on each other party its proposed terms for claim construction no later than 2/18/13, proposed claim const ruction and extrinsic evidence no later than 4/1/13; Joint Claim Construction Statement due 4/22/13; opening claim construction briefs and supporting evidence due 5/20/13, responsive claim construction briefs due 6/17/13; tutorial scheduled 6/17/13 at 10:00 a.m.; Claim Construction Hearing set for 7/29/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Paladin Brands Group, Inc. terminated pursuant to 21 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/23/2012 ORDERING that the Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc.'s response to the Complaint is due on 7/30/2012. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/13/2012 ORDERING Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc. to respond to the 1 Complaint by 7/23/2012. (Michel, G) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.