Rasheed v. Virga
| Tahee Abdullah Rasheed |
| Virga and Board of Prison Terms |
| 2:2012cv01012 |
| April 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/25/13 ORDERING that petitioners May 7, 2012 application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 6 ) and May 14, 2012 request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 7 ) are DENIED; Petitioner s May 14, 2012 request for injunctive relief and discover (Doc. No. 7 ) is DENIED; The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1 ) is summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254; and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/20/12 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
