Jones v. Virga
Petitioner: Rodney Wayne Jones
Respondent: Matthew Cate and Tim Virga
Case Number: 2:2012cv01138
Filed: April 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/03/13 ORDERING petitioner's request to expand the record is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied; and the district court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/15/2013 ORDERING that petitioner's 23 request for permission to expand the record is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/29/2013 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Respondents are DIRECTED to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. (Donati, J)
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/15/12 recommending that 11 MOTION to DISMISS be denied and respondent file an answer to the petition within 60 days, if these findings and recommendations are adopted. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/3/12 ORDERING that Petitioner's Application to proceed IFP 2 is GRANTED. Respondents are directed to file a response to Petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/reassignment form contemplated by Appendix A(k) to the Local Rules of this court together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tim Virga
Represented By: David N. Sunada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney Wayne Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?