McCaffery et al v. Alternative Learning Center et al
Beverly McCaffery |
Alternative Learning Center, Adult Educational Technologies, Inc., Alice Soard and Wendell James |
Hirst Law Group, P.C. |
United States of America and State of California |
2:2012cv01156 |
April 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/16/2022: In light of the Satisfaction of Judgment, ECF No. #82 , the Motion to Appoint Receiver, ECF No. #70 , is DENIED as MOOT. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
Filing 82 SATISFACTION of JUDGMENT re #61 Judgment by Hirst Law Group, P.C.. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 81 SATISFACTION of JUDGMENT as to Partial Satisfaction by Hirst Law Group, P.C.. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 80 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Alternative Learning Center, Alice Soard : #76 Declaration of Alice Soard. (Goins, Vernon) Modified on 7/15/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 79 AMENDED MEMORANDUM of Cost after Judgment by Hirst Law Group, P.C. re #78 Memorandum. (Serlin, Mark) Modified on 7/15/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM of Cost after Judgment by Hirst Law Group, P.C. (Serlin, Mark) Modified on 7/15/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 77 AMENDED BRIEF #75 Supporting Motion for Appointment of Receiver filed by Hirst Law Group, P.C. (Serlin, Mark) Modified on 7/14/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 76 DECLARATION (Not Signed) of Alice Soard in opposition to #70 Motion to Appoint Receiver,. (Goins, Vernon) Modified on 7/13/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 75 REPLY BRIEF to #70 Motion for appointment of receiver to enforce judgment filed by Hirst Law Group, P.C. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Serlin, Mark) Modified on 7/9/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 74 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/7/2021: On the court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Motion for Appointment of Receiver to Enforce Judgment Pursuant to Written Agreement, ECF No. #70 , is SUBMITTED without oral argument. The motion is submitted on the briefs, including the reply brief, if any, as provided by Local Rule 230(d). Accordingly, the hearing date of 7/16/2021 is VACATED. If the court determines that oral argument is needed, it will be scheduled at a later date. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
Filing 73 OPPOSITION by Alternative Learning Center, Alice Soard to #70 Motion to Appoint Receiver,. (Goins, Vernon) |
Filing 72 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Vernon C. Goins, II on behalf of Alternative Learning Center, Alice Soard. Attorney Goins, Vernon C. added. (Goins, Vernon) |
Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/6/2021: On the court's own motion, the hearing as to the Motion for Appointment of Reciver, ECF No. #70 , set for 7/16/2021 is ADVANCED on the same date to 10:00 AM before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
Filing 70 MOTION to APPOINT RECEIVER to Enforce Judgment Pursuant to Written Agreement by Hirst Law Group, P.C. Motion Hearing SET for 7/16/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Hearing, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #4 Declaration of Mark A. Serlin, #5 Proof of Service )(Serlin, Mark) Modified on 6/17/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 69 MEMORANDUM of Costs After Judgment by Hirst Law Group, P.C. Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 68 WRIT of execution ISSUED. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 67 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 66 APPLICATION for WRIT of EXECUTION by Hirst Law Group, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 65 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT by Hirst Law Group, P.C. re #61 Judgment. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 64 [DISREGARD atty to re-file] APPLICATION for WRIT of EXECUTION by Hirst Law Group, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 memorandum of costs after judgment)(Serlin, Mark) Modified on 3/31/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 63 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT by Hirst Law Group, P.C. re #61 Judgment. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 62 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Mark A. Serlin. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 61 JUDGMENT dated *3/25/2020* pursuant to order signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/24/2020. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 60 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/24/2020 GRANTING #58 Motion to Enter Judgment Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. Judgment SHALL be entered for plaintiff in the amount of $114,728.65 as the accelerated amount presently due under the Settlement Agreement, plus $31.43 per diem interest for every day from 11/1/2019 to the date this judgment is entered on the court's docket, and an additional $1,317.50 for attorneys' fees associated with the instant motion. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 59 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: On the court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Motion for Entry of Judgment (ECF No. #58 ) is SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date of 12/20/2019 is VACATED. If the court determines that oral argument is needed, it will be scheduled at a later date. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
Filing 58 MOTION for JUDGMENT by Hirst Law Group, P.C. Motion Hearing set for 12/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #3 Declaration, #4 Declaration, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Proposed Judgment, #7 Proof of Service)(Serlin, Mark) Modified on 11/20/2019 (Coll, A). |
Filing 57 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Mark A. Serlin on behalf of Hirst Law Group, P.C. Attorney Serlin, Mark A. added. (Serlin, Mark) |
Filing 56 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/2/17 ORDERING that Government Parties' request to seal is DENIED; This order and all future filings are UNSEALED, but all other contents of the court's file in this action remain under TEMPORARY SEAL pending further order of this court following review of any redaction request filed as provided below; Within seven (7) days of the filed date of this order, any party may SHOW CAUSE, under Local Rules 140 and 141, why any document currently remaining under seal should be redacted. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 55 RESPONSE to ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by United States of America. (Kennedy, Colleen) |
Filing 54 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/11/2017 ORDERING that the #1 complaint, the Government Entities' #46 notice, this order, and all future filings are UNSEALED, but all other contents of the court's file in this action remain under TEMPORARY SEAL pending further order of this court. Within fourteen days, any party may SHOW CAUSE why the previous filings in this action should remain under seal. Relator shall serve the complaint on the defendants. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 46 NOTICE of ELECTIONS to INTERVENE by State of California and United States of America against all defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Donati, J) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Beverly McCaffery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.