Costelo et al v. Pro30 Funding et al
| Celso Costelo and Maria S. Colmenares-Pratt |
| American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-5, T. Sevillano, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., American Home Mortgage Corporation, American Home Mortgage Assets, LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Pro30 Funding, Placer Title Company, Bank of America, N.A., Leticia Quintana and Recontrust Company |
| 2:2012cv01429 |
| May 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/12 ORDERING that the status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently set for hearing on 11/28/12, is vacated; the 9/28/12 order to show cause is discharg ed; and Plaintiffs' request for reassignment of this action to a district judge, 5 is denied as unnecessary; IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on plaintiffs' failure to prosecute the action and to comply with court orders, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this court's Local Rules; and the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/28/12 ORDERING that the status conference currently scheduled for 10/10/12, is reset for 11/28/12, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom # 24; Plaintiffs shall show cause, in writing, on or before 11/7/12, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to follow court orders and Local Rules; Also by 11/7/12, plaintiffs shall file a proof of timely service on defendants, or shall show cause, in writing, why any unserved defendants s hould not be dismissed for failure to effect service of process within the time prescribed by Rule 4(m); Also by 11/7/12, the parties shall file status reports (or a joint status report) setting forth the matters referenced in the court's 5/29/12 order, including the status of service of process. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
