Williams v. On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner: Antonio R. Williams
Respondent: Unknown
Case Number: 2:2012cv01588
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER AND AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/21/2014 DENYING petitioner's 48 , 50 motions for evidentiary hearing; and RECOMMENDING that respondent's 26 motion to dismiss the petition for untimeliness be granted, and this action be closed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/23/2014 ORDERING that, within no more than 30 days, petitioner and respondent shall file supplemental briefs on the issue of equitable tolling only, not to exceed 10 pages, along with any relevant exhibits.(Yin, K)
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/28/2014 ORDERING the 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are NOT ADOPTED IN FULL. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. (Donati, J)
October 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/7/2013 RECOMMENDING that 26 Amended Motion to Dismiss be granted; RECOMMENDING that this action be closed; REFERRING this matter to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen days. (Michel, G)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER denying 31 Motion to Stay, 35 Motion for release from judgment and 36 Motion for Extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/17/13. (Kaminski, H)
April 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/15/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
March 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/5/13 DENYING 20 Motion to Stay; Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended petition containing only claims previously exhausted in the California Supreme Court. (Dillon, M)
February 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/2013 ORDERING that petitioner is GRANTED 30 days within which to inform the court how he wishes to proceed with this matter by choosing one of the alternatives described above. If petitioner fails to so inform the court within 30 days, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Reader, L)
November 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/01/12 vacating 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Petitioner is granted 60 days from the date of this order to file an amended petition. (Plummer, M)
August 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/31/12 ORDERING that the 14 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; it is RECOMMENDED that petition 1 be summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 2 (c). Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
June 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/18/2012 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send petitioner an ifp form.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. On Habeas Corpus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio R. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?