Jones v. Vilsack, et al
Plaintiff: Michael R. Jones
Defendant: Thomas J. Vilsack and United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Case Number: 2:2012cv01590
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Shasta
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/26/13 ORDERING Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brought this civil action. The action was dismissed on January 17, 2013, all motions for reconsideration have been considered and decided, and plaintiff has appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion (Doc. 19) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. That motion is denied without prejudice to renewal in the appellate court. This action remains closed. (Becknal, R)
May 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/13/2013 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 12 and 13 motions are DENIED as plaintiff was informed the court will not entertain any further motions for reconsideration. The 6/14/2013 hearing date on plai ntiff's two motions is hereby VACATED. However, the court will amend a typo in its April 24 order. The court referred to plaintiff as a "state prisoner proceeding pro se." (ECF 11 at 1.) Plaintiff is a pro-se litigant but he is not a state prisoner. This typo did not factor into the court's analysis and plaintiff has not argued he suffered any prejudice from it. Accordingly, the court STRIKES the words "state prisoner" from its prior 11 order. Plaintiff is again admonished the court will not entertain any further motions in this case, and no further orders will issue. (Zignago, K.)
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/23/2013 DENYING 10 Motion for a new trial and/or amended judgment construed as a Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G)
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/6/12 recommending that this action be dismissed as duplicative of Eastern District of California case number 2:11-cv-2972 GEB CMK, and all pending motions be denied as moot. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Matson, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Vilsack, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas J. Vilsack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael R. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?