Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Diamond La'Shay Hart |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2012cv01628 |
| June 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/15/2013 ORDERING the Clerk of Court to randomly assign this case to a U.S. District Judge; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b) based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and to comply with court orders and Local Rules. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/6/2013 ORDERING that, within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall comply with the 1/28/2013 19 order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/28/13 ORDERING the deadlines set forth in the 7/3 scheduling order are suspended and the following briefing schedule issues: on or before 2/26/13, plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss; and on or before 3/26/13, defendant may file a reply to any opposition filed by plaintiff. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/15/2012 ORDERING that based upon Defendant's Motion to Extend 14 , Defendant shall have until 12/13/2012 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Krueger, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/2/2012 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve the Scheduling Order in Social Security cases; ORDERING Plaintiff to submit to the United States Marshal, within 15 days, an original and 5 copies of the completed Summons, 5 copies of the Complaint, 5 copies of the Scheduling Order, and a completed USM-285 form, and to file a Statement with the Court that said documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs no later than 60 days. (cc: USM) (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diamond La'Shay Hart | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Represented By: | Patrick William Snyder, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
