Riseley v. Warden, High Desert State Prison, et al.,
Plaintiff: Thomas Foote Riseley
Defendant: Brown and Warden, High Desert State Prison
Case Number: 2:2012cv01695
Filed: June 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/14/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 28 days. (Plummer, M)
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/6/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 8 are VACATED; Plaintiffs October 29, 2012 request for a copy of the courts August 23, 2012 order, and for an extension of time to c omply with the courts August 23, 2012 order 9 is GRANTED; The Clerk shall re-serve a copy of the courts August 23, 2012 order on plaintiff, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis; and Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint w ithin 30 days of the filing date of this order. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall also either: (1) file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis; or (2) pay the entire filing fee for this action. No further extensions shall be granted. (Dillon, M)
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/15/12 recommending that that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/22/12 ORDERING that Plaintiffs June 25, 2012, motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED; The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Paupe ris By a Prisoner; Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court; Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. The complaint is DISMISSED with 28 days to file an amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riseley v. Warden, High Desert State Prison, et al.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Foote Riseley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?