Cabardo et al v. Patacsil et al
| Joseph Cabardo, Donnabel Suyat, Mactabe Bibat, Marissa Bibat, Alicia Bolling and Renato Manipon |
| Marilyn Patacsil and Ernesto Patacsil |
| 2:2012cv01705 |
| June 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| William B. Shubb |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
261
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/29/22 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 253 plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' request for pre-bankruptcy attorneys' fees in the reduced amount of $1,077,218.62 and DENIES Plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees incurred in Defendants' bankruptcy proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
247
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/13/2021 GRANTING 242 Motion to extend time to apply for attorney's fees. Plaintiffs are GRANTED leave to amend their Motion for Attorney's Fees. Plaintiffs shall file an amended Motion for Attorney's Fees thirty (30) days from the date of electronic filing of this Order. The Court VACATES the hearing currently set for 4/29/2021. Plaintiffs shall notice a new hearing date with their amended motion. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
232
JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/16/2020 in favor of Plaintiffs Joseph Cabardo, Donnabel Suyat, Mactabe Bibat, Marissa Bibat, Alicia Bolling, Renato Manipon, Carlina Cabacongan, and John Dave Cabacongan against Defendants Marilyn Patacsil and Ernesto Patacsil in accordance with the jury verdicts returned 3/6/2020 (ECF Nos. 211 - 219 ), and the terms of the Court's 5/13/2020 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. (ECF No. 229 .) (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
229
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/12/20: Defendants are liable for $79,524.53 in PAGA civil penalties, $43,333.16 plus seven percent interest in restitution pursuant to the UCL to Mari ssa Bibat, and $43,333.16 plus seven percent interest in restitution to Renato Manipon. The parties shall meet and confer as soon as practicable and shall provide the Court with a Proposed Judgment consistent with these findings, the jury verdicts, and the Court's April 29, 2016 summary judgment order to be filed within 14 days of entry of this Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER RE JURY FEES signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/5/2020. (Krueger, M)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/20/18 GRANTING the Parties' Stipulation to Protective Order such that the parties shall refer to the resident's first name or first name and last initial in the progress notes, awake staff notes, night staff notes and transportation logs and generally refer to residents by first name or first name and last initial at trial. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
81
FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/20/18 ORDERING that the Jury Trial is SET for 1/28/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The parties' motions in limine are due no later than 5 p.m. on 1/14/2019 and Oppositions are due no later than 5 p.m. on 1/22/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
73
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/9/18, ORDERING that the trial is CONTINUED to 1/28/2019 at 09:00 AM and the Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 11/15/2018 at 02:00 PM, BOTH in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The Joint Pretrial Conference Statement is DUE on 11/8/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/18 ORDERING the Court previously set the jury trial for 5/21/18, the Final Pretrial Conference for 3/22/18, and ordered the parties to submit their Joint Pretrial Conference Statement on or before 5/15/18. (ECF No. 65.) This was the Court's error, as the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement must be submitted prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. The Court therefore RESETS the Final Pretrial Conference to 2:00 pm on 4/19/18, and orders the parties to submit their Joint Pretrial Conference Statement on or before 4/12/18. The jury trial remains set for 5/21/18.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/31/17 ORDERING that plaintiffs' 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART; Plaintiff Alicia Bolling is entitled to $550 in statutory penalties; Plaintiffs are entitled to collect civil penalties pursuant to PAGA and Plaintiffs may seek attorney's fees and costs by motion. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/16/14 ORDERING that the parties request to modify the scheduling order to re-open Discovery for limited purposes is GRANTED. The parties will work cooperatively to accomplish these depositions by 11/15/2014, including but not limited accommodation for vacation(s) and scheduling conflicts. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/25/14 DENYING 24 Ex Parte Application for a Protective Order; GRANTING 25 Request to Seal Dr. Kamali's March 2014 letter. The Clerk of Court shall file under seal Dr. Kamali's March 2014 letter. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/14/2014 ORDERING 19 Plaintiffs may file their First Amended Complaint, which will become the operative complaint upon filing. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
