Manning et al v. Crosby et al
| Lilly Manning, Kenyata Manning and Natasha Manning |
| Mike Crosby, Rachel Lane, Mary Struhs, Natasha Johnson, Stephanie Whitney-Cook, Pauline Tracey, Lynn Tracy, Sacramento Unified School District, Sacramento County, Department of Health and Human Services and Child Protective Services |
| 2:2012cv01784 |
| July 5, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/1/2016 ORDERING that discovery be completed by 5/13/2016; ORDERING all parties to disclose expert witnesses by 6/28/2016; ORDERING that dispositive motions be heard by 11/3/2016; CONF IRMING that Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statements be filed by 2/2/2017; CONFIRMING the Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/9/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; CONFIRMING the Jury Trial set for 4/3/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/1/2015 ORDERING 30 Discovery due by 4/1/2016; Expert Witness Disclosure due by 5/27/2016; Dispositive Motions filed by 10/20/2016; Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement by 2/2/2017; Final Pretrial Conference reset for 2/9/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; and Trial reset for 4/3/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
22
SECOND AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2015. All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 6/1/2015. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/30/2015. All dispositiv e motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 12/10/2015. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 4/7/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judg e Troy L. Nunley. The parties shall file, not later than 3/31/2016, a Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement. The Jury Trial is SET for 6/6/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The parties estimate a trial length of 16 day. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
20
AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/9/14: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 5/1/2015. Discovery due by 3/2/2015. Dispositive Motions filed by 9/10/2015. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/14/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Jury Trial set for 3/14/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/7/2013 ORDERING that this stipulation for a protective order will be enforced as an order of this court. This Stipulated Protective Order shall remain in full force and effect such that it may be enforced as a contract between the parties after the termination of this case, but the court will not retain jurisdiction after the termination of this case. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
