Hicks v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cardte Hicks
Defendant: Lowe's HIW, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv01883
Filed: July 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/6/14 ORDERING as set forth above, the court DENIES the motion. Plaintiff's second supplemental disclosure of expert witnesses, ECF No. 58 , is stricken. (Becknal, R)
April 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/14/14 ORDERING that Jury Trial is CONFIRMED for 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Each party is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the same. If no objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this Court.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/28/2014 ORDERING 45 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Waggoner, D)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/26/2014 ORDERING 35 Motion in Limine is DENIED; Having waived conflict as to the assigned magistrate judge, the parties are directed to attend a settlement conference with the Honorable Kendall J. New man on April 2,2014 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 25, 8th Floor. Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Counsel for each party shall submit a confidential Settlement ConferenceStatement by March 31, 2014. (Waggoner, D)
November 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/2013. (Zignago, K.)
December 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/20/12: All discovery shall be completed by 11/20/2013; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/21/2013, and supplemental list of expert wintesses due by 11/20/2013; All e xpert discovery shall be completed by12/20/2013; All dispositive motions shall be heard no later than 1/17/2014; The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/20/2014 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and joint pretrial conference statement is due by 1/30/2014; The Jury Trial is set for 4/7/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and trial briefs are due by 3/24/2014. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lowe's HIW, Inc.
Represented By: Gene B. Sharaga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cardte Hicks
Represented By: Robert Masuda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?