New Sensations, Inc. v. Unknown

New Sensations, Inc. v. Unknown

Plaintiff:	New Sensations, Inc.
Defendant:	Unknown
Case Number:	2:2012cv01885
Filed:	July 17, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 7, 2013	Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE and CONTINUING Status (pretrial Scheduling) Conference signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/7/13. Plaintiff is ORDERED to Show Cause (OSC) in a writing to be filed no later than 2/11/2013, why sanctions should not be impo sed against it and/or its counsel under Rule 16(f) of the FRCP for failure to file a timely status report. The Status Conference is RESCHEDULED for 3/4/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14)days prior to the status conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 17, 2012	Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/2012 granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion for Discovery; Plaintiff may immediately serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Sprint PCS to obtain the information detailed in this order; the I SP will have 30 days from the date of this Order to serve Joe Doe 1 with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this Order; the ISP shall confer with Plaintiff before assessing any charge in advance of providing the information requested in the subpoen a; the ISP shall preserve all subpoenaed information pending the ISP's delivery of such information to Plaintiff or the final resolution of a timely filed and granted Motion to Quash the subpoena with respect to such information; any information disclosed to the Plaintiff in response to the subpoena may not be used for any improper purpose and may only be used for protecting its rights as set for in the complaint; Plaintiff may request for an Order authorizing Plaintiff to serve subpoenas on other ISPs is DENIED without prejudice. (Waggoner, D)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 7, 2013

Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE and CONTINUING Status (pretrial Scheduling) Conference signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/7/13. Plaintiff is ORDERED to Show Cause (OSC) in a writing to be filed no later than 2/11/2013, why sanctions should not be impo sed against it and/or its counsel under Rule 16(f) of the FRCP for failure to file a timely status report. The Status Conference is RESCHEDULED for 3/4/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14)days prior to the status conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

October 17, 2012

Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/2012 granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion for Discovery; Plaintiff may immediately serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Sprint PCS to obtain the information detailed in this order; the I SP will have 30 days from the date of this Order to serve Joe Doe 1 with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this Order; the ISP shall confer with Plaintiff before assessing any charge in advance of providing the information requested in the subpoen a; the ISP shall preserve all subpoenaed information pending the ISP's delivery of such information to Plaintiff or the final resolution of a timely filed and granted Motion to Quash the subpoena with respect to such information; any information disclosed to the Plaintiff in response to the subpoena may not be used for any improper purpose and may only be used for protecting its rights as set for in the complaint; Plaintiff may request for an Order authorizing Plaintiff to serve subpoenas on other ISPs is DENIED without prejudice. (Waggoner, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: New Sensations, Inc. v. Unknown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: New Sensations, Inc.
Represented By:	Anne-Leith Matlock
Represented By:	Kenneth Brian Matlock
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?