Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association
Karen Williams |
U.S. Bank National Association |
2:2012cv01907 |
July 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/15. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R) |
Filing 100 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY SETTLEMENT APPROVAL signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/5/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs are to file their proposed Second Amended Complaint within three business days of the date of this Order. Defendant shall provide supplemental class data to Class Counsel within 14 days from this Order. Class Counsel shall inform the Claims Administrator of the Notice Allocation within 7 days of receiving that data. Class Notice shall be distributed by the Claims Admin istrator within seven days of receiving that Allocation information. The Hearing on the Motion for Final Approval is set for 3/18/2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8. Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Final Approval by 2/18/2015. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 94 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/20/2014 ORDERING any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED; Clerk is directed to reassign this case to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan as presider; all future pleadings filed in this case shall bear the case number 2:12-cv-1907 EFB.(Waggoner, D) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/20/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Conditional Certification 28 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall send its Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit forthwith to all potential class members. The notice shall contain no advertising, commentary or any other material, other than what is disclosed at ECF No. 29-15. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/27/13: U.S. Bank shall take the depositions of Plaintiffs Heidi Miller and Jeanette Burnell on March 7th and 8th, respectively. U.S. Bank' s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification shall be filed by March 14, 2013. The hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification, shall remain on March 25, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/13/2012. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Karen Williams | |
Represented By: | Robert L. Schug |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.