Clay v. AT&T Communications of California, Inc. et al
Jerome Clay |
AT&T Communications of California, Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. |
2:2012cv02027 |
August 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John A. Mendez |
Kendall J. Newman |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 STIPULATION and ORDER 34 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/16/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/5/2013 VACATING any scheduled dates in this action and ORDERING that parties file dispositional documents no later than 4/29/2013. (Donati, J) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/4/2013 ORDERING Plaintiff to pay sanctions to the Clerk of Court, within 14 days, in the amount of $100 for his failure to file a Status Report and appear at the Status Conference; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Status Report within 28 days. (Michel, G) |
Filing 29 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/3/2013 ORDERING Within 28 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file a written statement indicating whether he still intends to actively prosecute this action in federal court, and if so, shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to file a status report and appear at the 1/3/2013 status conference; Plaintiff's failure to file the required written statement shall constitute a dditional grounds for, and plaintiff's consent to, the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiff's case be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a). (Reader, L) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/13/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 24 are ADOPTED; and Plaintiff's motion to remand the action to state court, and for an award of attorneys' fees and costs, is DENIED. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/16/12 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to remand the action to state court, and for an award of attorneys' fees and costs, be DENIED; Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/2012 ORDERING that within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this order, defendants shall file a declaration by a knowledgeable person identifying the source from which short-ter m disability ("STD") benefits under the AT&T West Disability Benefits Program are initially paid. Plaintiff may file an appropriate response to defendants' declaration within seven (7) days of service with defendants' declaration, after which the motion will be submitted on the record. The parties shall not file any further supplemental briefing other than the limited filings required and/or authorized above. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/18/12: HEARING as to 10 MOTION to REMAND RESET for 10/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Defendants shall file a supplemental brief in accordance with this order no later than September 27, 2012. Plaintiff shall file any response to defendants' supplemental brief in accordance with this order no later than October 10, 2012. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.