Flowers v. Warden High Desert State Prison et al
| Rico Flowers |
| D. Sissions, M. Barnes and R. Hood |
| 2:2012cv02047 |
| August 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/21/16 ordering the court has now determined that the matter has settled. The court now orders that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than 14 days from the date of this order. All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are VACATED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/25/16 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Rico Flowers at 10:00 am in Courtroom 8 before Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
72
AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/3/16 ORDERING the parties to file their witness lists by 8/1/2016. The parties are to exchange copies of all their exhibits and exhibit list by 8/1/2016, a nd each party present the original and two (2) copies of the exhibit(s) and exhibit list to the Court Clerk's Office by 8/1/2016. The parties are to file with the Court and exchange between themselves by 8/1/2016 a statement designating port ions of depositions intended to be offered or read into evidence. The parties are to file with the Court and exchange between themselves by 8/1/2016 the portions of Answers to Interrogatories which the respective parties intend to offer or read into evidence at the trial. The joint statement of case must be filed with the Court by 8/1/2016. The joint set of jury instructions must be filed by 8/1/2016. The parties must file a joint verdict form(s) concurrently with proposed jury instructions by 8/1/2016. The voir dire questions shall be filed with the Court by 8/1/2016. The parties shall file trial briefs not later than 8/1/2016. Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 7/18/2016. Oppositions must be filed by 7/25/2015, and any reply must be filed by 8/1/2016. A Jury Trial is SET for 8/22/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/27/16 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to send counsel for defendant and plaintiff the court's form for consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. If the parties wish to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction thereby obtaining an expedited trial date, they shall so indicate on the form and return the form to the court within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/9/15 ORDERING that the Defendant's request to continue the trial date is GRANTED. The 6/8/15 trial date is VACATED. Trial in ths case is RESCHEDULED for 3/7/16 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/07/14 ordering defendant's request for a 14 days extension of time to file a pretrial statement 56 is granted. Defendant's pretrial statement is now due on or before 11/21/14. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/4/2014 ORDERING that within 15 days, the parties shall submit confidential settlement statements as set forth in this order; and the Clerk shall send a copy of this order to ADR Division. (cc: ADR)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/2/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file and serve his pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial within 30 days of this order. Plaintiff s hould consult the courts January 9, 2013 scheduling order and Local Rule 281 for the contents of pretrial statements and motions for obtaining witnesses at trial. Defendant Sisson shall file his pretrial statement within 14 days of service of plaintiffs. After the parties submit their pretrial statements, the court will issue a pretrial order identifying the date for trial.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/26/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 46 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 32 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendants Hood and Barnes and DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's remaining claim against Defendant Sisson. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/3/2014 DENYING defendants' 9/9/2013 "request for judicial notice..."; and RECOMMENDING that defendants' 32 motion for summary judgment be granted with respect to plaintiff's remaining claims against defendants Hood and Barnes and denied with respect to plaintiff's remaining claim against defendant Sisson. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/21/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff is granted 30 days within which to file an amended opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff need not file an amended opposition, but may do so having now been provided with Rand notice. Any reply to plaintiffs amended opposition shall be filed and served no later than 14 days after service of plaintiffs amended opposition.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/11/13 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non- opposition. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/07/13 ordering that defendants have until 09/09/13 to file their motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/11/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 25 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/22/12 DENYING 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/23/12 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Rico Flowers to the clerk until the balance of $350 is pai d in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/10/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
