Kaddoura v. Dougherty et al
| Hosam Kaddoura |
| State of California and Malcolm Dougherty |
| 2:2012cv02114 |
| August 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/14 ORDERING that plaintiff's 1 complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/5/14 ORDERING that plaintiff SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/23/14 SETTING Mid-Litigation Status Conference for 8/22/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Any party may appear at the Mid-Litigation Status Conference te lephonically by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 at least 48 hours before the Mid-Litigation Status Conference. A land line telephone number must be provided; each party shall file a statement addressing the status of the litigation of this action, of no more than five pages in length, on or before 8/15/14; and the parties are cautioned that failure to appear at the status conference telephonically or in person may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction.(Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/20/2013. All Discovery shall be conducted so as to be completed by 3/28/2014. Plaintiff shall disclose the names of any Expert Witnesses by 2/14/2014; defendant shall disclose any Expert Witnesses on or before 2/28/2014. All Law and Motion shall be submitted by 8/1/2014. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/2013 ORDERING that the Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2013, is CONTINUED to 12/20/2013 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Each party is required to p ersonally appear at the Final Pretrial Conference, either by counsel or, if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf. Within fourteen days of the date of this order plaintiff shall SHOW GOOD CAUSE in writing for his failure to file a timely Pretrial Statement and shall file a Pretrial Statement. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/2/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 9/11/2013 21 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as untimely. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/30/2012 DENYING, without prejudice, 9 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; DENYING, without prejudice, 12 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment; VACATING the Motion Hearing as to 12 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment set for 12/14/2012. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/7/12 ORDERING that a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 11/30/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve his own separate Status Report on or before 11/16/2012, and Defendant shall file and serve a Status Report on or before 11/23/2012. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
