Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
| Gregory M. Moore |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation |
| 2:2012cv02125 |
| August 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/26/2012 ORDERING 11 the Proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED; REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Placer; and Wells Fargo's 6 Motion to dismiss and plaintiff's motion to amend are DENIED as MOOT; (Copy of remand order sent to other court). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/24/2012 ORDERING that the 10/3/2012 hearing on Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss # 6 is VACATED; and the 12/12/2012 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that this action be Remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Placer, and Wells Fargo's # 6 motion to dismiss, and plaintiff's motion to amend # 10 be denied as moot; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
