Newman v. The Law Offices of St. Amant and Associates

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Newman v. The Law Offices of St. Amant and Associates

Newman v. The Law Offices of St. Amant and Associates

Plaintiff:	Eric Paul Newman
Defendant:	The Law Offices of St. Amant and Associates
Case Number:	2:2012cv02127
Filed:	August 15, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence K. Karlton
Presiding Judge:	Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 25, 2014	Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/23/14 ORDERING that Defendant's answer 7 is striken and the Clerk is directed to enter Defendant's default; Plaintiff is granted fifteen days from the date of this order in which to file a Motion for default judgment; and the Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order by certified mail on counsel for defendant at this address of record and at the addresses in paragraph 6 an 7 of the Declaration of Plaintiff's Counsel filed 9/26/13 11 . (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 26, 2013	Filing 12 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/26/13. Counsel for defendant shall show cause within 15 days why sanctions, including an order striking the answer and entering default, should not be imposed for failure to comply with the requirements of the 10/31/12 scheduling order. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order by certified mail on counsel for defendant. The 9/30/13 pretrial conference is VACATED. (Manzer, C)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 25, 2014

Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/23/14 ORDERING that Defendant's answer 7 is striken and the Clerk is directed to enter Defendant's default; Plaintiff is granted fifteen days from the date of this order in which to file a Motion for default judgment; and the Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order by certified mail on counsel for defendant at this address of record and at the addresses in paragraph 6 an 7 of the Declaration of Plaintiff's Counsel filed 9/26/13 11 . (Mena-Sanchez, L)

September 26, 2013

Filing 12 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/26/13. Counsel for defendant shall show cause within 15 days why sanctions, including an order striking the answer and entering default, should not be imposed for failure to comply with the requirements of the 10/31/12 scheduling order. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order by certified mail on counsel for defendant. The 9/30/13 pretrial conference is VACATED. (Manzer, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. The Law Offices of St. Amant and Associates
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Paul Newman
Represented By:	George Thomas Martin, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Law Offices of St. Amant and Associates
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?