Altheide v. Board of Prison Terms et al
| Jason Altheide |
| MDO Director of CDCR, Board of Prison Terms and Tracy DVI |
| 2:2012cv02157 |
| August 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/12 ordering this action is construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 6 is granted. The complaint is dismissed with 30 days to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner a form for a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/30/12 denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall submit within 21 days of this order, either a completed application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the fomr provided by the clerk of the court or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in district court without prepaying of fees or costs. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
