Ajuluchuku v. Citibank

Ajuluchuku v. Citibank

Plaintiff:	Amanda U. Ajuluchuku
Defendant:	Citibank
Case Number:	2:2012cv02172
Filed:	August 20, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2012	Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/12 RECOMMENDING that this case be transferred to the District Court for the Central District of California and terminate all pending motions on this court's docket as no longer pending in this district. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
November 9, 2012	Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/08/12 DENYING Citibank's 4 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice at this time, and vacates the hearing date currently set in connection with that motion. If the undersigned orders that the complaint be served after screening it, Citibank may re-file its motion to dismiss after being served with process. (Benson, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2012

Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/12 RECOMMENDING that this case be transferred to the District Court for the Central District of California and terminate all pending motions on this court's docket as no longer pending in this district. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)

November 9, 2012

Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/08/12 DENYING Citibank's 4 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice at this time, and vacates the hearing date currently set in connection with that motion. If the undersigned orders that the complaint be served after screening it, Citibank may re-file its motion to dismiss after being served with process. (Benson, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ajuluchuku v. Citibank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda U. Ajuluchuku
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Citibank
Represented By:	Thomas S Arthur
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?