Jones et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Janelle Jones and T. J. |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cates, Mike McDonald, Ed Simmerson and John McClellan |
2:2012cv02181 |
August 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Morrison C. England |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/13/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' 102 Motion for approval of the compromise of the minor plaintiff T.J.'s claims is GRANTED. The Court further orders disbursement of minor Plaintiff T. J .'s $36,500 in settlement proceeds as follows: Payment to Plaintiff Janelle Jones, the guardian ad litem of Plaintiff T.J., minor T.J.'s net settlement proceeds in the amount of $21,900, and payment to Tron & Tron, attorneys for the minor Plaintiff T. J., the amount of $14,600 in attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 2/14/2017 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 99 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/2/2016 GRANTING Plaintiff's 93 Ex Parte Application to Continue Hearing. The Hearing on the 89 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT is CONTINUED to 2/23/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 78 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/22/16 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 61 Motion to Dismiss AND DENYING 63 Motion to Strike. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II is GRANTED as to Defendant Cate, and DENIED as to Defenda nt McDonald. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count III is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count IV is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have been given multiple opportunities to amend their claims and are clearly unable to allege facts to support the claims dismissed above, the Court finds that further amendment would be futile and thus DECLINES to grant leave to amend. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 76 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/15/15 ORDERING that the date for the Pre-Trial Settlement Conference be VACATED to be reset by the Court once the pleadings are set and the case is at issue. (Benson, A) |
Filing 74 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/6/15. The current trial date and pre-trial deadlines are VACATED to be reset subsequent to ruling on the pending Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 57 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/26/15 ORDERING for the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 47 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' m otion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' first amendment claims against Defendants Simmerson and McClellan; Defendants' motion for qualified immunity as Plaintiffs' fourteenth amendment claim for loss of companionship is GRANTED; Defendants ' motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' third claim for relief against Defendants Cate and McDonald with leave to amend; Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' state law claims against Defendants Cate and McDonald; and Plaintiffs are granted twenty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve a second amended complaint. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/30/2015 MODIFYING the Scheduling Order as follows: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/27/2015. Discovery due by 6/2/2015. Dispositive Motions shall be heard by 8/13/2015. Mo tion shall be filed 35 days before the hearing, with opposition due 14 days before the hearing, and reply 7 days before the hearing. The Pretrial Conference is RESET for 11/19/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The Jury Trial RESET for 1/25/2016 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The Settlement Conference is RESET for 9/17/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kaminski, H) Modified on 2/2/2015 (Krueger, M). |
Filing 40 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/27/14. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 37 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/13/14 re: 36 MODIFYING 35 Scheduling Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 35 Pretrial Scheduling Order be modified as follows: Discovery due by 10/10/2014; Settlement Confer ence set for 11/20/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Each party is DIRECTED to submit to the chambers of Judge Allison Claire confidential settlement conference statements not later than 7 days prior to the date of the Settlement Conference. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/3/2014, Dispositive Motions filed by 12/11/2014.. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/19/13 GRANTING leave for plaintiffs to file a First Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Motion to Dismiss is WITHDRAWN and the hearing is VACATED; and IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file the First Amended Complaint within 5 calendar days of the Court's Order permitting such filing and that defendants' responsive pleading thereto shall be filed within 30 days after the filing of the First Amended Complaint. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/16/2012 ORDERING that the 8 Motion to Appoint ad Litem is GRANTED. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.