Lee v. City of Stockton et al
| Kimberly C. Lee |
| Kevin K. Mikaelian, Victor W. Macko, Paul M. Stadelman, Sutter Gould Medical Foundation, Corky Hull, Mike Dixon, City of Stockton and Dameron Occupational OS-OHS |
| 2:2012cv02210 |
| August 24, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/2/13 Recommending that Plaintiff's 8/4/12 Application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 be denied. Plaintiff's original complaint filed 8/24/12 1 as well as her p roposed amended complaint filed with her request for reconsideration on 11/19/12 4 be dismissed without further leave to amend; and This action be closed. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to these F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/2012 ORDERING that within 21 days, plaintiff shall submit the appropriate filing fee. Failure to comply in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
